I wouldn’t worry about this too much.  It’s more a point that it can happen,
not will happen.  I prefer pools because I can control how much memory is
used and am aware of it up front (at the beginning).  And I have a feeling
pools are more efficient.

 

Bill

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Oscar F
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:51 AM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Recv en socket TCP

 

Hello, but i don´t understand this, your advice, i don't Know about
fragmentation, 
Oscar

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Bill Auerbach <[email protected]>
wrote:

>As Kieran already said, it is generally a good idea to first get your
>application running with the standard options and once that works begin
>tweaking it to suit your memory/resource needs. MEM_LIBC_MALLOC saves
>you some code-memory if you already use malloc provided by your
>C-library somewhere else (not in lwIP) because you then do not need the
>lwIP heap implementation. On the other hand, memory usage gets a little
>less predictable as you then share the heap with the rest of the code
>running on your target. Thus, this setting largley depends on your
>target.

I thought I'd ask something that just occurred to me: Can lwIP's
implementation of malloc result in fragmentation of lwIP's heap?

If it can, than a system requiring 24/7 operation would be better off using
lwIP pools since they cannot fragment.

Bill




_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

 

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to