I will try to find the IRC log about this discussion to know the reasons (it should be in my home computer). I know it was in "[task #6969] Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer" if it can help...
==================================== Frédéric BERNON HYMATOM SA Chef de projet informatique Microsoft Certified Professional Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 Email : [email protected] Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr Plan d'accès au siège social ==================================== P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement -----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Simon Goldschmidt Envoyé : mercredi 7 octobre 2009 11:56 À : Mailing list for lwIP users Objet : Re: [lwip-users] link down and netconn problem > I hadn't considered getting rid of them altogether, but you make a > good case for it. Interestingly, CVS says you added the ERR_IS_FATAL > macro so if you don't understand what they're for, I'm guessing that > no one does! That was after a discussion with Frédéric, who did not agree that no errors are fatal. I think before that, we did not have non-fatal errors at all (meaning there were checkes for conn->err == ERR_OK at some places) and as I did not convince him, we added the 'fatal' check as a consensus. However, I'm still not totally satisfied with this solution... Simon -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
<<attachment: Frédéric BERNON.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
