Kieran Mansley wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:18 +1300, David Empson wrote:
Kieran Mansley wrote:
> I was a bit wrong there. I've taken another look at the code and this
> change in behaviour is intentional. There were two changes in 1.3.1:
> - only send an explicit window update if the change is greater than
> TCP_WND_UPDATE_THRESHOLD.
> - only change the window advertised (including in normal ACKs) if the
> change is greater than 1 MSS. This is silly window avoidance, and
> designed to prevent the sender getting small amounts of window and then
> sending small packets.
The description of silly window avoidance in RFC1122 (section 4.2.3.3)
says
that there is supposed to be a second test.
The threshold to advertise an increase in window size should be the
lesser
of MSS and WND/2 (assuming the recommended fraction of 1/2).
Sounds like a good change. Could you file a bug for this?
Done.
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?27783
I added another paragraph summarising the behavour observed with the code as
it stands.
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
