Is there a suggestion for my current situation? I was required to make faster TCP interact.
But smaller TSS, cause long ACK times, lower performance. Big TSS cause ACK lost, still poor performance. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Kieran Mansley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 18:06 +0800, yueyue papa wrote: >> The problem is easy to meet in larger TSS 1460, but with 512 TSS , I >> could see the send/receive is very stable. > > The likely reason for this is that with a smaller MSS you have more > segments per window, and because we ACK every other segment you have > more ACKs per window, and so the effect of any one ACK being lost is > diminished - you'll probably receive another one soon after the lost one > and so be able to carry on as ACKs are cumulative. > >> Kieran, could you guild me to add code for force send duplicate ACK > > No, this is not the right solution. > > Kieran > > > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
