Ok Simon, thanks for the answer, now I know the wiki is up-to-date. /Magnus
2011/10/21 Simon Goldschmidt <[email protected]> > Magnus S <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are there any benefits from using counting semaphores instead of binary > > semaphores for lwIP? > > No. > > > Is it at all possible to use binary semaphores with lwIP? > > Yes. > > > According to this wiki-page it seems as the choice does not matter, but > > are > > there any other considerations that should be taken into account? > > http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Porting_for_an_OS > > And it seems the wiki is correct there. > > > In my case the system is using AVR32 with FreeRTOS. > > In the default setting of the Atmel example applications, binary > > semaphores > > are used. Could that cause any issues? > > No. > > When using counting semaphores, lwIP will only count them to 1, so there's > no real use for that. > > Simon > -- > Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir > belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
