On 23/11/2011 12:27, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Kieran Mansley <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes, I think the 16-bit int is likely to be the biggest hurdle. It is >> something we should really try and improve with lwIP, but progress is likely >> to be slow. > > Things like this are hard to change when you don't have corresponding > hardware. I'd love to see a patch that fixes this to see if we can integrate > it. >
I don't think a 16 bit int would cause too much of a problem, with some inspection/effort. I believe, however, the OP said it was a 16 bit char, which leads me to think he is probably using a DSP, which would definitely cause a problem. Maybe definitely is too strong a word, but as the original reply said, making it work would probably require a large effort. Regards, Richard. + http://www.FreeRTOS.org Designed for Microcontrollers. More than 7000 downloads per month. _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
