Hi Simon,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:08:04PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > > That would be great! If 2.4.x really fixes bugs where we found them, > that overrides the argument of staying with the 2.3.x code base > because of smaller code size PPPd 2.4.x is at least used in all major Linux distributions, and benefits from patchs from them. For example, there are 37 patchs for PPPd into Debian, and some of them fixes bugs. I guess this is because PPPd upstream does not answer. The PPPd bugs tracker do not work anymore too and one bug I sent there went into the middle of nowhere. > (since 2.4.x brings in some features that are seldom used and are not > conditionally compiled). We can add the necessary compile-time conditions, this is pretty easy to do, I am planning to do so with the previous compile-time options used. Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
