Mason <[email protected]> wrote:
> If LWIP_TCPIP_CORE_LOCKING is 0, tcpip_netifapi looks
> fairly similar to tcpip_callback_with_block.
>
> Does netifapi make sense when LWIP_TCPIP_CORE_LOCKING is 1,
> in which case there is no message passing, the operation is
> done within the calling context holding LOCK_TCPIP_CORE?
Using netifapi makes sense in both configurations as you can just use the
predefined functions instead of writing your own code. I didn't quite get why
you can't use the netifapi functions, though.
Simon
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
