On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:04 -0400, Chen wrote: > Simon, thanks for your reply. > > is setsockopt( sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, (char *)&flag, > sizeof(flag) ) the same as tcp_nagle_disable(myconn->pcb.tcp)? > > I already have tcp_nagle_disable(myconn->pcb.tcp) in my codes when I > observed packets size alternating between 200 and 1400 bytes
Yes, they should be the same. A packet capture might show something interesting. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
