"Marco Jakobs" wrote:
> then i have misunderstand how to do it … i thought non-blocking is the
> precondition to use a sendtimeout.
> 
> Can I find an explanation somewhere?

Dunno, this is not made up by us, it's basic behaviour copied from standard 
sockets.

> Basically I want that a netconn_write on a TCP connection times out and
> returns after a configurable time with an error instead blocking the task for
> a certain long time. What would you suggest how to realize this?

Doesn't send-timeout work without setting the socket non-blocking?


Simon

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to