Hi, On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:54:13PM -0300, Sergio R. Caprile wrote: > > I don't agree, some vendors, like Atmel, have a perfectly clean lwIP port > > announced as being production ready, and it really is. > > Kudos to Atmel then ! > The only problem with them down here is that their products are hard to get. > I used to have a strong sympathy for TI and I think I still have it. > > I'll start taking a closer look to Atmel. Thanks!
They even do perfect documentation (perfect documentation is almost always the case with Atmel) about lwIP[1], way better than our own lwIP documentation, and which really prove they have a deep understanding of lwIP internals. We really should ask Atmel if we can re-use their documentation in order to improve by several order of magnitude the quality of lwIP embedded documentation. Sylvain [1] http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-42233-Using-the-lwIP-Network-Stack_AP-Note_AT04055.pdf
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
