Hi Mohsin,

It will be good if you post your latest code here which includes all of the
earlier suggestions.

Thanks,
Rahul


On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Mohsin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rahul Gundecha-2 wrote
> > Hi Mohsin,
> >
> > I have http server working simultaneously on both IPv4 and IPv6 sockets.
> > Here are my suggestions in your code:
> > 1. Why you are using same "iStatus" for both socket descriptors?
> > 2. Same question for "sin". For IPv4, you need to use struct sockaddr_in,
> > whereas for IPv6 struct sockaddr_in6 variable, so two different
> variables.
> > 3. iStatus = socket( AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0 ); => 0 should be replaced
> by
> > IPPROTO_TCP which is 6
>
> Thank you Rahul for your suggestions.
> I've already tried changing socket descriptor variables as well as sock
> struct variables for IPv4 and IPv6 as you suggested above, but none works.
>
> Actually, I first bind IPv4 ANY address and then IPv6 ANY address to same
> port=80 in two different tasks. So in this case, IPv4 is atleast sending
> SYN+ACK for first TCP SYN request from PC and then RST,ACK whereas IPv6
> immediately sends RST,ACK for every TCP req.
>
> If I reverse the sequence of bind. i.e. IPv6 ANY address first and then
> IPv4
> ANY address, then IPv6 is able to send SYN+ACK reply to first TCP SYN
> request whereas IPv4 immediately sends RST,ACK for every SYN req.
>
> Hence, I think there happens some conflict in binding of two diff protocols
> to same port so that whichever is binded first is able to send atleast one
> SYN+ACK instead of directly RST.
>
>
> Regards,
> Mohsin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/How-to-have-two-different-sockets-for-IPv4-and-IPv6-tp24291p24320.html
> Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to