Hallo Simon, They support only LWIP 1.4.0. It is part of the Visual DSP++, which can be downloaded as trial version. http://www.analog.com/en/design-center/processors-and-dsp/evaluation-and-dev elopment-software/vdsp-bf-sh-ts.html
The LWIP code is in the path "VisualDSP 5.1.1\Blackfin\lib\src\lwip\src" The changes can be found by searching for #ifdef __ADSPBLACKFIN__ I found there is another port of LWIP for Blackfin under http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Available_device_drivers Has anybody experience with this port? Best regards, Sandra -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected] Gesendet: Samstag, 19. September 2015 18:00 An: [email protected] Betreff: lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 10 Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Assertion on Select (Sandra Gilge (ADATIS)) 2. Re: Assertion on Select (Michael Steinberg) 3. Re: Assertion on Select ([email protected]) 4. Re: Assertion on Select ([email protected]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:19:09 +0200 From: "Sandra Gilge (ADATIS)" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Hallo Simon, is there a stable revision between the head revision and the latest revision I could take? Updating new revisions is with my port is not so easy since the port for Blackfin is from analog devices and they made quite some changes to the lwip stack. Best regards, Sandra Am 18.09.2015 um 18:00 schrieb [email protected]: > Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Assertion on Select (Sandra Gilge) > 2. Re: Assertion on Select (Simon Goldschmidt) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:35:39 +0200 > From: "Sandra Gilge" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select > Message-ID: <002b01d0f206$2547ea60$6fd7bf20$@com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hallo Simon > > > > I don't want to move the complete code to the head revision. Is it > enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a problem? > > I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem? > > > > Here's the correspondence we already had: > > > > > > Sandra Gilge wrote: > > Now I'm having problems with following assertion when calling select. > > LWIP_ASSERT("sock->select_waiting >= 0", sock->select_waiting >= 0); > > > Do I remember correctly that there was a bug in there somewhere? > Depending on your thread priorities, git master could fix the issue. > > > Simon > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was > scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/attachments/20150918/ > aa2021bc/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:50:05 +0200 > From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select > Message-ID: > > <trinity-9bab99d1-63f3-4db5-a3fb-76f213e23adf-1442577005716@3capp-gmx- > bs60> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Sandra Gilge wrote: >> I don?t want to move the complete code to the head revision. >> Is it enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a problem? > Picking one file only will most certainly not work. You can do this on your own, but honestly, I don't want to support this. If you don't want to move to a newer version, you will have to identify the fixing changes and try to apply them to your version. > >> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem? > Maybe. But maybe that's not all, I don't know, sorry. > > > Simon > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > > End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 9 > ****************************************** > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:54:59 +0200 From: Michael Steinberg <[email protected]> To: Mailing list for lwIP users <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Hey, is using their netif driver plus a vanilla lwip (ie. savannah git master) no option? I don't think the netif-interface changed much. I had no real troubles from 1.41 to head. I'd rather ask them to contribute their changes in a generic way, after all they're profitting from a free stack as it seems. Kind Regards, Michael Am 18.09.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Sandra Gilge (ADATIS): > Hallo Simon, > > is there a stable revision between the head revision and the latest > revision I could take? > > Updating new revisions is with my port is not so easy since the port > for Blackfin is from analog devices and they made quite some changes > to the lwip stack. > > Best regards, > Sandra > > Am 18.09.2015 um 18:00 schrieb [email protected]: >> Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Assertion on Select (Sandra Gilge) >> 2. Re: Assertion on Select (Simon Goldschmidt) >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:35:39 +0200 >> From: "Sandra Gilge" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select >> Message-ID: <002b01d0f206$2547ea60$6fd7bf20$@com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hallo Simon >> >> >> >> I don't want to move the complete code to the head revision. Is it >> enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a problem? >> >> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem? >> >> >> >> Here's the correspondence we already had: >> >> >> >> >> >> Sandra Gilge wrote: >> >> Now I'm having problems with following assertion when calling select. >> >> LWIP_ASSERT("sock->select_waiting >= 0", sock->select_waiting >= 0); >> >> >> Do I remember correctly that there was a bug in there somewhere? >> Depending on your thread priorities, git master could fix the issue. >> >> >> Simon >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was >> scrubbed... >> URL: >> <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/attachments/20150918 >> /aa2021bc/attachment.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:50:05 +0200 >> From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select >> Message-ID: >> >> <trinity-9bab99d1-63f3-4db5-a3fb-76f213e23adf-1442577005716@3capp-gmx >> -bs60> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> Sandra Gilge wrote: >>> I don?t want to move the complete code to the head revision. >>> Is it enough to replace sockets.c to a newer version? Or is this a problem? >> Picking one file only will most certainly not work. You can do this on your own, but honestly, I don't want to support this. If you don't want to move to a newer version, you will have to identify the fixing changes and try to apply them to your version. >> >>> I guess it is the issue #31741 that might be the problem? >> Maybe. But maybe that's not all, I don't know, sorry. >> >> >> Simon >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lwip-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >> >> End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 9 >> ****************************************** >> > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:38:47 +0200 From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: Mailing list for lwIP users <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sandra Gilge wrote: > Updating new revisions is with my port is not so easy since the port > for Blackfin is from analog devices and they made quite some changes > to the lwip stack. Do they have a download link where I could check the sources they provide? I'm always interested in seeing what the changes are processor vendors seem to think are necessary... I have no doubt that they would report a bug if their changes were only bug-fixing ones... :-) Simon ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:45:59 +0200 From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: Mailing list for lwIP users <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Assertion on Select Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sandra Gilge wrote: > is there a stable revision between the head revision and the latest > revision I could take? If you mean between 1.4.1 and git master, then no, unfortunately. Simon ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 145, Issue 10 ******************************************* _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
