there are no plans at the momet. Please file a task for it.
Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * [email protected] * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Aditya Prakash <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > > I guess dual-stack is not well tested with socket API :-( I did most of > the dual-stack stuff, but since I don't use IPv6 and socket API at work, I > have no real-life tests for it. > > Are there any plans to make this work, Or can this be added as a task to > make socket API work with dual stack? > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Aditya Prakash < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am able to implement a web server using dual stack. However, I have an >> MDNS implementation using two UDP sockets, for v4 and v6. My specification >> requires me to join and send messages to v4 as well as v6. However, when I >> try doing a `sendto` to the IPv4 group (inet_addr("224.0.0.251") ), using a >> v6 socket, say fd is 'sock6', >> >> to.sin_family = AF_INET; >> to.sin_port = port; >> to.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("224.0.0.251"); >> >> len = sendto(sock6, (char *)m->header, size, 0, (struct sockaddr >> *)&to, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)); >> >> the following check fails >> >> ' if ((to != NULL) && !SOCK_ADDR_TYPE_MATCH(to, sock))' >> >> also if I try to append ::ffff: in the beginning of the address(changing >> family accordingly), the joingroup call fails. >> >> As of now I use the same above sockaddr_in `to` to join v4 group via >> setsockopt ADD_MEMBERSHIP. I wanted to know if it is possible to implement >> the mdns without using the low level calls as in the lwip's example >> mdns(i.e. using socket apis). >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Aditya Prakash < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Two years back I made a web server based on LwIP that uses two sockets, >>> one for IPv4 and one for IPv6. >>> >>> However recently I have seen that there have been a quite a lot of >>> changes regarding dual stack, I am not sure to what extent it is >>> implemented. I was wondering whether these changes would allow me to get to >>> use a single socket for both IPv4 and IPv6. >>> >>> --------- >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Aditya Prakash >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> --------- >> Thanks & Regards, >> Aditya Prakash >> > > > > -- > --------- > Thanks & Regards, > Aditya Prakash > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
