Hi Simon, >That suggests the pbuf chain is invalid, i.e. tot_len of the pbuf was more >than the pbuf chain (via ->next) provided. I assume a pbuf allocation error >somewhere. >My suggestion would be to upgrade to 2.0.x and benefit of Sylvain's great work >on PPP improvements!
Unfortunately that's easier to say than to do. Apart from a fear that 2.0.x might be slightly bigger and will not fit into my processor, this would mean weeks of regression testing to be able to release such a change in a major component. So I guess we need to find what's wrong in 1.4.1 here. We found that also a ping with l=220 bytes triggers the same issue. Intereting that a UDP packet with the same length via PPP netif does not cause the issue (as the header length of UDP is the same). Marco _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
