Hi,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:13:56PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > Sylvain Rochet wrote: > >I checked if the issue was still there is the current master/2.0 branch, > >you are right, this bug was fixed in commit fb07a28c99 ("fixed bug > >#36388 (PPP: checksum-only in last pbuf leads to pbuf with zero > >length)") *FIVE* years ago. > :-)) > > Thanks, for jumping in, Sylvain! > > Marco, I know you always say you don't have the time to re-evaluate new > verisons, but you could save us *and* yourself much time hunting those old > bugs by just taking the time to upgrage ;-) There have been *many* bugs > fixed since 1.4.1! I can't agree more, putting 1.4.1 in production today looks like a mistake. > The possibility of code size increasement is something I always wanted to > investigate (and fix if required), but I haven't found the time to do so, > lately... :-( Well, last time we checked, with PPP enabled, lwIP core size increasement didn't cross the PPP code size decreasement: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-devel/2015-03/msg00082.html So, with PPP enabled, lwIP 2.0 is still probably lighter (or roughly equivalent) than 1.4. I'm too lazy to check if this statement is still true right now :-) Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
