2017-10-26 4:03 GMT+08:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > Joel Cunningham wrote: >> >> >> I've updated the remaining comments to mention the same priority on git >> master >> > > Hmm, thinking about this, shouldn't we instead change the killing scheme to > not kill active connections? It's been like it is for long, but given this > bug report, I think the way the comment says it would be might be a better > choice...
I use netconn APIs. I found it always create tcp pcb with TCP_PRIO_NORMAL. i.e. the priority is all the same. So in such case, killing the active connections with the same priority or not does matter. In current code, create new connection won't fail because it will always kill the oldest active connections. Such behavior seems strange because I would expect new connection to fail rather than killing existing active connections. _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
