Hello,

I'm trying to resolve an issue with regards to PPP and ARP requests. My
network topology is as follows,

Laptop (192.168.1.3, ethernet) <-> MCU #1 (192.168.1.4, ethernet) <-> MCU
#1 (192.168.1.126, PPP serial [server]) <-> MCU #2 (192.168.1.127 PPP
serial [client])

The issue I'm running into is that when I try to send a packet to MCU #2
(192.168.1.127) from the laptop, the ARP request the laptop sends is never
satisfied. This makes sense to me, as the instance of lwip running on MCU
#1 can't respond to this ARP request as it doesn't have MCU #2's IP address
in its routing table (and shouldn't). In this case, one solution is to add
a static route to the laptop's routing table to send all requests destined
for 192.168.1.127 out of the interface corresponding to 192.168.1.4. Voila,
no ARP request for 192.168.1.127, no problem.

Unfortunately, however, our team is working with some antiquated hardware
in place of the "laptop" in the above example that doesn't support adding
static routes.

So, in doing some Googling around and reading of past posts on this forum,
it seems like layer 2 forwarding is one possible solution here (MCU #1
would be responsible for this). I was thinking of using PPP proxy arp
support on MCU #1, but noticed that it was commented out of the lwip ppp
implementation in 2015 (commit hash 99bcce78...). The commit message simply
reads "PPP, IPCP, removed proxy ARP support". Was curious to know if this
is something that, if the surrounding `#define`s were removed, would likely
just work, or if there was some underlying implementation issue that led to
its removal. Also, any other ideas about how this problem might be resolved
otherwise, given the constraints on network topology?

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to