Sylvain wrote:

> My best guess is a low level driver bug that happen when packets are
> sent in a short timeframe, which big UDP packets do due to IP
> fragmentation taking place. Sending small packets at a low rate does not
> fix the problem, it just hides it.
>

I've indicated such in the GitLab issue I had open with Xilinix. Thanks
again for everyone's responses!

   Dan

,

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:57 PM Dan Nygren <dan.nyg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sylvain wrote > ... Anyway, basic rule about using fragmented IP packets:
> avoid (to not say
> don't).
>
> Thank you for the advice Sylvain. My design is keeping its packets under
> the Ethernet 1500 octet MTU. I had made a diagnostic command to have my
> design send back arbitrarily sized messages to prove everything was working
> correctly when I ran into the 4385/4386 message size problem.
>
>   Dan
>
> ,
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 1:24 PM Dan Nygren <dan.nyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter wrote:
>>
>> > 4385/4386 could be 3x MTU ? ...
>>
>> Peter, thanks for responding!
>> Yes, it seems like I've hit some corner case.
>> Is this the right place to notify the lwIP maintainers of problems? This
>> is not a current problem for me as my messages are under the MTU size. I
>> just hit this while developing some diagnostics for my board and I wanted
>> to let others know about it.
>>
>>             Dan
>>
>> ,
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:10 PM Dan Nygren <dan.nyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello fellow lwIP users. Can anyone point me in the right direction on
>>> how to resolve or report to the right folks the below issue?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing rather bizarre behavior in that messages of length 4385 and
>>> 4386 I send to a lwIP based UDP echo server are not received back.
>>> udp_sendto() appears to be getting called and completing successfully.
>>> Wireshark indicates there are "bogus, payload length" errors with these
>>> lengths.
>>>
>>> I have a detailed write up showing the behavior here:
>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/embeddedsw/issues/212
>>>
>>> I can copy the info above into an email for this mailing list if you
>>> prefer.
>>>
>>> Let me know your suggestions on how to proceed. ...   Dan Nygren
>>>
>>> ,
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to