Hello, > We wanted to know whether > a) additional classes are needed, and > b) whether the currently proposed classes by Carsten need to be modified.
I would greatly appreciate to invite you to a further reading of the document entitled "Java embarqué" http://videos.rennes.inria.fr/irisatech/logiciel%20embarque/Fred-Rivard.pdf This document gives a good overview of the MCU market and it should help in providing guidance about the proposed classes. Best Regards, Guillaume FORTAINE On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we drifted away from the initial discussion. > > We wanted to know whether > a) additional classes are needed, and > b) whether the currently proposed classes by Carsten need to be modified. > > I heard folks saying > a) yes - we need a class 0 for very small devices, and > b) the current classes need to be modified (although I haven't really seen a > convincing proposal). > > I believe it also makes sense to briefly describe what we believe can be done > with devices of the various classes. > For example, a device from class 0 can already run IP, DNS, DHCP and a > UDP/TCP based client side application with a pre-shared secret key based > security mechanism. > > Ciao > Hannes > _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
