There is no relationship between the two drafts from a content point of view. Tero talks about IKEv2 and this document talks about TLS/DTLS.
The issues that I raised do, however, concern both documents. Sent from my ASUS Pad Zhen Cao <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Hannes, > > >Thank you for this interesting draft. I think energy aspect is also valuable >to look into. > > >One question, what the relationship with the Tero's ikev2 draft? Ikev2 has >certificate based authentication, what's the implication from your draft. > > >Best regards, > >Zhen > > >On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> >wrote: > >Hi all, > >I have submitted a draft about minimal TLS in the spirit of the work that Tero >was doing. >Working on the document, which you can find at >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-lwig-tls-minimal-00.html, I >noticed the following issues: > >Just providing a writeup that illustrates how to implement a shared secret >based ciphersuite is not sufficient. The reason is that in certain cases >shared secret based variants do not meet the security requirements. Hence, >when we look at more than just a single ciphersuite then the question arises >where to stop looking at the various extensions. This is a scoping question. > >I don't think it makes sense to replicate the text from the original >specification. The document cannot violate the original specification itself. >It can only provide design tradeoffs. > >Ideally, to give engineers more guidance one would have to provide some code >size indications. Of course specific numbers only serve as an indication/hint >since the code size depends on the specific platform and the degree of >optimization applied to the code. > >Finally, there is the question whether codesize is the only aspect to look at. >What about memory requirements, bandwidth consumption, etc.? > >In a nutshell, to offer valuable guidance this could be a longer exercise. (I >would like to work with a few others on this topic. Does not sound fun to do >this alone. Maybe there even a chance to produce a lightweight TLS reference >implementation or so.) > >I wonder what others think. > >Ciao >Hannes > >_______________________________________________ >Lwip mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > >
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
