Hi Tero, What I mentioned during the meeting is this practice suggested by RFC6982. You can consider include a section about Implementation Status, to arise awareness of there is running code.
-z > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cao > Zhen (CZ) > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 6:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Lwip] Implementation Status Experiment > > Hello Everyone, > > On the Intarea WG meeting in Berlin, the AD introduced the RFC6982 "Improving > Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section". > http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/87/slides/slides-87-intarea-7.pdf, to raise > awareness of existing implementations. (not only to protocol specifications, > but > also applies to documents which talk about implementation guidance) > > I believe this is related to the Lwig working group here. So I would like to > encourage the editors of related documents consider to include an > "Implementation Status " section > > Thanks and regards, > Zhen > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
