Dear Omprakash, WG list, We have reviewed draft-gnawali-roll-rpl-recommendations-05, and we would like to share our comments:
1.- Section 3 states "In systems that cannot cancel the packets that are already in the queue, it is advisable to set the minimum interval to be much larger than the minimum link layer packet time." Could "much larger" be quantified? 2.- In section 5, the first sentence "If a node receives more DIOs than the redundancy constant..." should be changed a bit by a new sentence like: "If a node receives a number of DIOs greater than or equal to the redundancy constant..." 3.- In section 5, regarding the range proposed for the redundancy constant, i.e. 3-5: can this range be applied for any network density? For which network density has this range of redundancy constant values been tested? Thanks! Hamidreza Kermajani and Carles Gomez Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
