Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a common problem among all these documents: they are confusing > because they have no clear reference point and some of the relevant and > interesting content is not typically part of the IETF work (such as > implementation, and hardware).
> Covering the topic in a generic fashion just does not work.
I understand what you are saying, and I think that it plagues all across the
IoT space.
> Just to give you an idea what practical help with regard to energy
> efficiency I would be looking for.
> I have a Nordic nRF51822-mKIT board
>
http://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/Bluetooth-Smart-Bluetooth-low-energy/nRF51822-mKIT/(language)/eng-GB
> What parameter settings could I pick (that have impact on energy
> consumption) using mbed (which provides the OS and the protocol stack)
> for a few common Bluetooth Smart deployment scenarios / communication
> patterns?
what if we turn the question around:
- what parameters should mbed *provide* in order to in order let energy
consumption be tuned by protocol users?
> This is obviously nothing you would put in an IETF draft but I fear that
> this is the type of info people care about.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpxYOZy7LD6I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
