Kathleen Moriarty writes:
> > Nit that I'm sure the RFC editor would have caught:
> > Last paragraph at the bottom of Page 4, so is repeated:
> > "Minimal implementations only need to support the role of initiator,
> >    so so it"

Fixed in my xml copy, I will wait to see if there will be other
changes before making new version.
-- 
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

Reply via email to