Hi, My personnal opinion is that the copied text in this document is useful for the understanding of how the minimal IKEv2 works. It also makes the document easier to read and reduces the number of jumps from the IKEv2 spec and the minimal implementation doc. The counter part is that changes of IKEv2 may impact the optimizations described in the minimal implementation document. Although I understand this issue, I do not think this is an important issue here. The minimal document clearly mentions the IKEv2 document it refers too. In addition, changes to IKEv2 at that state are likely to result in IKEv3.
BR, Daniel On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 Dec 2015, at 7:36, Robert Cragie wrote: > > As shepherd, I agree with what Jari says and stand by my comment that >> Informational is the right intended status. FWIW, I did raise the issue of >> copying text with Tero and was satisfied that it was an editorial choice >> to >> do it that way. >> > > Noted, and thanks for weighing in. Please see my most recent comments on > this to Jari and Tero. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip >
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
