Hi Joe, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 6/21/2016 12:25 AM, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote: > > I'm guessing clamping window size won't be a good way to make TCP > > perform stop-and-wait operation and there is no good way for it. > > Because TCP is basically not designed to perform stop-and-wait > > operation, I think you'll have to describe the operation explicitly if > > you want to do it. > > If the window is 1 MSS, then it ought to work just fine as you want. > > TCP is designed to run sliding window; stop-and-go is just a name for > sliding window where N=1. I.e., it is designed for stop-and-go operation > just fine -that's how a lot of transoceanic links behaved when sharing > was high and capacity was low anyway. > But, tcp's sliding window is not controlled by MSS. It uses byte to control it.. When you sent 0.1 MSS, TCP doesn't wait for an ACK before sending another 0.1 MSS. -- Yoshi
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
