As a co-author, I am supporting the adoption of the document. I implemented ESP by myself and the document was a very good start. We also have ongoing effort in implementing Minimal-ESP in RIOT. There is also an implementation available for Contiki, which was more the less the starting point for the Minimal-ESP document. Yours, Tobias
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: IETF Secretariat <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. August 2018 09:52 > An: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-mglt-lwig-minimal- > [email protected] > Betreff: The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state "Call > For Adoption By WG Issued" > > > The LWIG WG has placed draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp in state Call For > Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Zhen Cao) > > The document is available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp/ > > Comment: > At the IETF 102 LWIG meeting in Montreal, there was support for adopting > this draft. If you have comments/objections/concerns regarding the > adoption of this draft, please respond to the list by August 30, 2018. > > -cochairs.
pgpxNpyyKKBZh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
