Hello Heinrich, Thanks for your review and comments. See my comments&questions to confirm inline.
> I don't know why IETF would publish this document when they have rfc 6973. This draft has much content not stated in RFC6973 (which is a general recommendation) , e.g., overhead analysis /delay/handshake performance analysis. > I want to see some actual performance from a real ESP implementation where > privacy is protected and energy is saved by tweaking the TFC and how often > dummy packet is sent. Are you saying that you would like to see more implementation guidance other than what's been already provided? or do you think the current recommendations are unreasonable? Btw, sharing the implementation code is encouraged but not mandatory in IETF. We by default trust the authors because they are foremost responsible for their work (particularly informational ones). Best regards, Zhen > > Ciao > Heinrich > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
