Hello,
I've read the draft and I think the draft looks fine and mostly ready.
I have some comments below..
1: Section 4.2.4:
"In that case, RTO algorithm tuning may be considered, although
careful assessment of possible drawbacks is recommended"
-> It might be better if we refer draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider here
although it is not very certain the draft will be published at this
moment? It seems to me the motivation of the doc fits the situation
like this.
2: Section 4.3.1:
"These algorithms work efficiently for window size of at least 5 MSS"
-> Just curious why this is 5? Is it because the use of delayed ack is presumed?
A receiver may have a chance to send an ack for segment 1 before
segment 3 arrives.
3: Section 5.3
CCN -> CNN?
"This overhead could be reduced by TCP Fast Open (TFO)"
-> Yes, but the use of TLS is not mandatory in this draft. If an
implementation utilizes TFO, we might want to mention about app level
idempotency here.
"TCP keep-alive messages are not very useful to..."
-> We don't need to discuss reducing the interval of keep-alive here?
Thanks,
--
Yoshi
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:47 PM Carles Gomez Montenegro
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear LWIG and TCPM WGs,
>
> As you can see below, we have updated the "TCP Usage Guidance in the
> Internet of Things (IoT)" draft.
>
> This revision intends to address previously pending TODOs, as well as
> comments from the LWIG session in Montreal.
>
> As you may recall, we are getting ready for requesting a WGLC. Your
> comments will be most welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carles (on behalf of all authors)
>
>
> ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
> Subject: [Lwip] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04.txt
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Tue, October 9, 2018 7:30 am
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Light-Weight Implementation Guidance WG
> of the IETF.
>
> Title : TCP Usage Guidance in the Internet of Things (IoT)
> Authors : Carles Gomez
> Jon Crowcroft
> Michael Scharf
> Filename : draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04.txt
> Pages : 25
> Date : 2018-10-08
>
> Abstract:
> This document provides guidance on how to implement and use the
> Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) in Constrained-Node Networks
> (CNNs), which are a characterstic of the Internet of Things (IoT).
> Such environments require a lightweight TCP implementation and may
> not make use of optional functionality. This document explains a
> number of known and deployed techniques to simplify a TCP stack as
> well as corresponding tradeoffs. The objective is to help embedded
> developers with decisions on which TCP features to use.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-04
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
