Changes in version -03 are:

- Added message sizes for key exchange protocols. So far TLS 1.3 DTLS 1.3 and 
EDHOC. This has been the most requested addition since version -00
- Some reformulations and clarifications

How would the group like to see the key exchange (handshake) information 
structured?

What would the group like to be added in future versions? Obvious things that 
could be added are TLS 1.2 handshake, DTLS 1.2 handshake, Group OSCORE, 
Reencodings of the TLS handshake (TLS-C, CTLS) 
(draft-schaad-ace-tls-cbor-handshake, draft-rescorla-tls-ctls)

Cheers,
John

-----Original Message-----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, 11 March 2019 at 23:12
To: John Mattsson <[email protected]>, Francesca Palombini 
<[email protected]>
Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-03.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-03.txt
has been successfully submitted by John Mattsson and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison
Revision:       03
Title:          Comparison of CoAP Security Protocols
Document date:  2019-03-11
Group:          lwig
Pages:          41
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-03.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison/
Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-03
Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison
Diff:           
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-03

Abstract:
   This document analyzes and compares the sizes of key exchange flights
   and the per-packet message size overheads when using different
   security protocols to secure CoAP.  The analyzed security protocols
   are DTLS 1.2, DTLS 1.3, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3, EDHOC, OSCORE, and Group
   OSCORE.  The DTLS and TLS record layers are analyzed with and without
   6LoWPAN-GHC compression.  DTLS is analyzed with and without
   Connection ID.

                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

Reply via email to