Hi Christian,
Yes, we (Zhen and I) as chairs are definitely interested in finishing this
document. There is plenty of valuable information there.
@Authors (Matthias, Olaf, Carsten): What do you think? Do you need any help to
revive and finish this document?
Zhen and Mohit
On 3/10/20 6:55 PM, Christian Amsüss wrote:
Hello CoRE and LWIG,
(retransmitting as I missed the LWIG list name oddity, please reply to
this to keep the thread intact)
working on the portability of my aiocoap library I had trouble reusing
the IPV6_RECVERR option recommended in draft-ietf-lwig-coap-06[1], and
found that it does not seem to be portable at all; unlike the
IPV6_RECVPKTINFO option recommended in the paragraph above, IPV6_RECVERR
is only mentioned in the IETF scope in this document, and otherwise
appears to be proprietary to Linux.
Is that a known shortcoming? Are there any more portable mechanisms that
can be recommended instead?
Best regards
Christian
[1]: I see has expired -- is there interest in having this continued? It
has been valuable so far
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
