Hi Martin,

Thanks for the review, please find my comment below.

Yours,
Daniel

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 1:42 PM Martin Duke via Datatracker <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Bob Briscoe for the TSVART review.
>
> Sec 2.1. I find it odd that a node implementing IPSec is overburdened by
> generating a random number, but this is not my domain.


This is the other way around: even a node that is unable to generate values
can protect its communication with IPsec.

Sec 3. Bob and the authors had an interesting discussion on time-based SN
> and
> replay windows. It seems to me that the best way to do this would be for
> the
> receiver to keep a replay window of some number of packets rather than
> SNs. The
> receiver would then store the last, say, 10 packet SNs regardless of how
> many
> SNs that covered. This would avoid all the issues with the sender skipping
> many
> SNs.
>
> The use of time provided the advantage of not maintaining states for every
packet. Keeping that 10 packet state ends up in maintaining state for every
packet sent/received. It could be useful if state maintenance is not an
issue for that node which connects nodes with state constraints.

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

Reply via email to