On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
>> Hi Serge,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
>> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:41:36PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> >> > This patch splits out most of the cgroupfs-specific code, so that
>> >> > cgroup-manager versions can be plugged in. The case I did
>> >> > not handle is cgroup_enter at lxc_attach. I'm hoping that case can
>> >> > be greatly simplified, but will worry about it after fleshing out the
>> >> > cgroup manager handlers.
>> >> >
>> >> > This also simplify the freezer functions.
>> >> >
>> >> > This seems to not regress my common tests when running without
>> >> > cgmanager, but I'd like to do a bit more testing before pushing.
>> >> > However I was hoping to get some more eyes on this so am sending it
>> >> > out now.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
>> >>
>> >> So I haven't spotted anything obviously wrong with it, besides the few
>> >> functions that are currently marked as unimplemented.
>> >
>> >> I also confirmed that the code still builds on all supported platforms
>> >> (without cgmanager), so if it breaks the existing code path, it doesn't
>> >> do so in any obvious way.
>> >
>> > All my testing currently seems to be passing (using cgroupfs driver).
>> > Ideally I'd like to get wider testing. Can anyone suggest a better way
>> > than for me to simply push the patch upstream?
>>
>> Haven't looked at the new code but seems like freezer code is broken
>> on master (or something else changed), this is _without_ cgmanager
>> https://gist.github.com/caglar10ur/8450091
>
> Ah you had me worried - broken is a strong word there :) It's just a
> bit overly verbose.
Hahah, sorry for that, I realized that the tests had been passing
after I sent the email :)
> The following patch should fix it:
Yep, much better now. Thanks!
> From e8d07ef2058baa04f42561533e121bf37c886e29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:41:44 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] shut up freezer_state
>
> Not being able to get freezer state is perfectly valid - if the
> container does not exist. The old version of freezer_state
> only reported an error on actually reading the cgroup file,
> but not on not finding a cgroup file. Leave it to the caller
> to report the error if it is important, since we don't actually
> know any useful info here anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
> ---
> src/lxc/cgroup.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/cgroup.c b/src/lxc/cgroup.c
> index c4022af..8ea347d 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/cgroup.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/cgroup.c
> @@ -2090,10 +2090,8 @@ int freeze_unfreeze(const char *name, int freeze,
> const char *lxcpath)
> lxc_state_t freezer_state(const char *name, const char *lxcpath)
> {
> char v[100];
> - if (lxc_cgroup_get("freezer.state", v, 100, name, lxcpath) < 0) {
> - ERROR("Failed to get freezer state for %s:%s", lxcpath, name);
> + if (lxc_cgroup_get("freezer.state", v, 100, name, lxcpath) < 0)
> return -1;
> - }
>
> if (v[strlen(v)-1] == '\n')
> v[strlen(v)-1] = '\0';
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-devel mailing list
> lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
--
S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org>
_______________________________________________
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
