On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 16:00 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > I haven't seen this suggested before: How about making > > lxc-start -n container > > an alias for > > lxc-start -n container -d > lxc-console -n container
> ? I was thinking along those lines too. Literally, if someone has this problem, just do it at the shell level with an alias... alias lxc-start='lxc-start -d' Stuff it in a .profile somewhere. > This would allow me to detach from the container, if I > forgot the "-d" for lxc-start. Which is a nice idea that would preserve most of the current behavior if we had a sane default for stderr. > Regards > Harri Regards, Mike -- Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | [email protected] /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
