-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17.05.2014 21:10 Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Ok... I'm primarily a Fedora / CentOS / RHEL / SL / NST guy. All > rpm and yum based. I dabble in SUSE once in a while, or I use to. > If they used the LXC project's lxc.spec file then the lua stuff is > in the lxc-lua package. It's broken out separately but, if lxc-top > depends on lua, maybe there's a missing dependency. But... Maybe > they're not using our lxc.spec file (HELL even Fedora is not using > our stock lxc.spec file... Sigh...). I added a --enable-lua to the spec and compiled it, but I got the same error. Is there a way to check which options have been used to compile lxc? I.e. to see if this has actually been used correctly? At the moment I am working on a duplicate package of the lxc from the Virtualization:-Repository, where I try to use the spec I got from inside the 1.0.3.-tarball. I had to make some changes, to get it to build at all. When all is settled down, I will sent these changes upstream. Regards, Johannes - -- `But you think you're right?´ said Harry. `Naturally I do, but as I have already proven to you, I make mistakes like the next man. In fact, being - forgive me - rather cleverer than most men, my mistakes tend to be correspondingly huger.´ (Albus Dumbledore, Harry Potter 6) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlN4opAACgkQzi3gQ/xETbL6cwCdFDrjSB+ayNcT6w5VAQ54SdT/ GsMAoI3STaskODtoZmZvPakPhuxp5eEm =h3Zr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
