Patch looks good, I'm also pretty surprised nobody noticed before because the output must have been pretty awful until that patch :)
Can you just reply to this e-mail with your Signed-off-by line so I can
include this in master?
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:08:50AM -0300, Andre Nathan wrote:
> ---
> src/lxc/confile.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/confile.c b/src/lxc/confile.c
> index 0e932c6..9af2aa4 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/confile.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/confile.c
> @@ -2216,15 +2216,15 @@ static int lxc_get_item_nic(struct lxc_conf *c, char
> *retv, int inlen,
> if (netdev->ipv6_gateway_auto) {
> strprint(retv, inlen, "auto");
> } else if (netdev->ipv6_gateway) {
> - char buf[INET_ADDRSTRLEN];
> - inet_ntop(AF_INET, netdev->ipv6_gateway, buf,
> sizeof(buf));
> + char buf[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
> + inet_ntop(AF_INET6, netdev->ipv6_gateway, buf,
> sizeof(buf));
> strprint(retv, inlen, "%s", buf);
> }
> } else if (strcmp(p1, "ipv6") == 0) {
> struct lxc_list *it2;
> lxc_list_for_each(it2, &netdev->ipv6) {
> - struct lxc_inetdev *i = it2->elem;
> - char buf[INET_ADDRSTRLEN];
> + struct lxc_inet6dev *i = it2->elem;
> + char buf[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN];
> inet_ntop(AF_INET6, &i->addr, buf, sizeof(buf));
> strprint(retv, inlen, "%s\n", buf);
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-devel mailing list
> lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
--
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
