Quoting SF Markus Elfring ([email protected]): > Hello, > > Several functions perform input parameter validation before their > implementations will try further actions with side effects. Some calling > functions perform similar safety checks. > > Functions which release a system resource are occasionally documented in the > way > that they tolerate the passing of a null pointer for example. > I do not see a need because of this fact that a function caller repeats a > corresponding check. > > Now I would like to propose such a change again. > > 1. Extension of the test infrastructure for the analysis tool "Coccinelle" > Semantic patch patterns can help to identify update candidates also in the > LXC source file hierarchy. > http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
If it's possible to do this automatically through github that'd be nice. > 2. Clarification for some automated update suggestions > My source code search approach found 19 affected source files with the help > of the software "Coccinelle 1.0.0-rc22" at least which might need another > review > and corresponding corrections. Further software development will point even > more > potentially open issues out. > https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/158 > > Regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > lxc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
