Can you give us an example?
Quoting Harald Dunkel ([email protected]): > Hi folks, > > "lxc-ls" implies a certain similarity to Unix' "ls" command, > some releases ago lxc stopped to ignore hidden container > directories. > > Did this happen on purpose? Is there a common config option > for lxc to bring back the expected behavior wrt hidden > directories? > > > Regards > Harri > _______________________________________________ > lxc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
