CRIU can get confused if there are two dumps that are written to the same
directory, so we make some minimal effort to prevent people from doing this.
This is a better alternative than forcing liblxc to create the directory, since
it is mostly race free (and neither solution is bullet proof anyway if someone
rsyncs some bad images over the top of the good ones).

Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <[email protected]>
---
 src/lxc/lxccontainer.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
index dbcee99..8999f44 100644
--- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
+++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
@@ -3683,6 +3683,7 @@ static bool do_lxcapi_checkpoint(struct lxc_container *c, 
char *directory, bool
 {
        pid_t pid;
        int status;
+       char path[PATH_MAX];
 
        if (!criu_ok(c))
                return false;
@@ -3690,6 +3691,15 @@ static bool do_lxcapi_checkpoint(struct lxc_container 
*c, char *directory, bool
        if (mkdir(directory, 0700) < 0 && errno != EEXIST)
                return false;
 
+       status = snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/inventory.img", directory);
+       if (status < 0 || status >= sizeof(path))
+               return false;
+
+       if (access(path, F_OK) == 0) {
+               ERROR("please use a fresh directory for the dump directory\n");
+               return false;
+       }
+
        if (!dump_net_info(c, directory))
                return false;
 
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
lxc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to