Ok - if you'd like to send a patch for that that'd be great.  I don't have
any systems where I ever run over that codepath, not sure how many others
do, so i'm not entirely surprised that noone else has reported this.

thanks,
-serge

Quoting Przemyslaw Rudy ([email protected]):
> Yes, commenting out 'return -1' makes it starts and it seems to behave 
> correctly.
> 
> The /proc/self/mountinfo done from inside the container is empty (as no proc 
> is mounted).
> If I mount it (by lxc.mount.auto or directly inside the container) then:
> 
> 42 20 0:2 /containers/mycnt/rootfs / rw - rootfs rootfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743
> 43 42 0:19 / /dev rw,nodev,relatime - tmpfs none 
> rw,size=100k,mode=755,uid=100000,gid=100000
> 44 43 0:5 /null /dev/null rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 45 43 0:5 /zero /dev/zero rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 46 43 0:5 /full /dev/full rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 47 43 0:5 /urandom /dev/urandom rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 48 43 0:5 /random /dev/random rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 49 43 0:5 /tty /dev/tty rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 50 43 0:5 /console /dev/console rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> 51 50 0:11 /0 /dev/console rw,relatime - devpts devpts 
> rw,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000
> 52 42 0:2 /shared /tmp rw - rootfs rootfs rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743
> 30 43 0:20 / /dev/pts rw,relatime - devpts devpts 
> rw,gid=100005,mode=620,ptmxmode=666
> 31 43 0:20 /0 /dev/tty1 rw,relatime - devpts devpts 
> rw,gid=100005,mode=620,ptmxmode=666
> 32 42 0:18 / /proc rw,nodev,relatime - proc proc rw
> 
> 
> BTW. Just to be exact, in first mount log before starting lxc I forgot to 
> enable cloning, so the exact line is:
> 19 18 0:16 / /sys/fs/cgroup rw,relatime - cgroup cgroup 
> rw,cpuset,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,net_cls,clone_children
> instead of:
> 19 18 0:16 / /sys/fs/cgroup rw,relatime - cgroup cgroup 
> rw,cpuset,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,net_cls
> 
> On 29.07.2015 15:32, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > If you rebuild lxc patching that paragraph to warn but not return
> > failure when the umount of './proc' fails, does the container start
> > properly?  What does /proc/self/mountinfo inside the container then
> > look like?
> > 
> > -serge
> > 
> > Quoting Przemyslaw Rudy ([email protected]):
> >> /proc/self/mountinfo before the lxc-start:
> >>
> >> 1 1 0:2 / / rw - rootfs rootfs rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743
> >> 13 1 0:5 / /dev rw,relatime - devtmpfs devtmpfs 
> >> rw,size=90972k,nr_inodes=22743,mode=755
> >> 14 1 0:4 / /proc rw,relatime - proc proc rw
> >> 15 13 0:11 / /dev/pts rw,relatime - devpts devpts 
> >> rw,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000
> >> 16 13 0:13 / /dev/shm rw,relatime - tmpfs tmpfs rw,mode=777
> >> 17 1 0:14 / /tmp rw,relatime - tmpfs tmpfs rw
> >> 18 1 0:15 / /sys rw,relatime - sysfs sysfs rw
> >> 19 18 0:16 / /sys/fs/cgroup rw,relatime - cgroup cgroup 
> >> rw,cpuset,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,net_cls
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/29/2015 04:07 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >>> I suspect you're right and we should simply ignore the failure.
> >>>
> >>> Can you show /proc/self/mountinfo before the lxc-start?
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Przemyslaw Rudy ([email protected]):
> >>>> -1 is rv, errno is 22 EINVAL
> >>>>
> >>>> The log:
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.086 INFO     lxc_start_ui - 
> >>>> lxc_start.c:main:264 - using rcfile /containers/mycnt/config
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.087 INFO     lxc_confile - 
> >>>> confile.c:config_idmap:1376 - read uid map: type u nsid 0 hostid 100000 
> >>>> range 65536
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.087 INFO     lxc_confile - 
> >>>> confile.c:config_idmap:1376 - read uid map: type g nsid 0 hostid 100000 
> >>>> range 65536
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.087 WARN     lxc_cgfs - 
> >>>> cgfs.c:lxc_cgroup_get_container_info:1100 - Not attaching to cgroup 
> >>>> cpuset unknown to /containers mycnt
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.087 DEBUG    lxc_start - 
> >>>> start.c:setup_signal_fd:259 - sigchild handler set
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.089 DEBUG    lxc_console - 
> >>>> console.c:lxc_console_peer_default:500 - opening /dev/tty for console 
> >>>> peer
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.089 DEBUG    lxc_console - 
> >>>> console.c:lxc_console_peer_default:506 - using '/dev/tty' as console
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.089 DEBUG    lxc_console - 
> >>>> console.c:lxc_console_sigwinch_init:179 - 509 got SIGWINCH fd 9
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.089 DEBUG    lxc_console - 
> >>>> console.c:lxc_console_winsz:88 - set winsz dstfd:6 cols:0 rows:0
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.089 INFO     lxc_start - start.c:lxc_init:451 
> >>>> - 'mycnt' is initialized
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.095 DEBUG    lxc_start - 
> >>>> start.c:__lxc_start:1137 - Not dropping cap_sys_boot or watching utmp
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.097 INFO     lxc_start - 
> >>>> start.c:resolve_clone_flags:848 - Cloning a new user namespace
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.112 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:instantiate_veth:2703 - instantiated veth 
> >>>> 'veth-mycnt/vethNPPNHE', index is '12'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.112 INFO     lxc_cgroup - 
> >>>> cgroup.c:cgroup_init:65 - cgroup driver cgroupfs initing for mycnt
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.122 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:lxc_assign_network:3120 - move 'eth0' to '512'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.122 NOTICE   lxc_start - start.c:do_start:667 
> >>>> - switching to gid/uid 0 in new user namespace
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.125 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:setup_rootfs:1284 - mounted '/containers/mycnt/rootfs' on 
> >>>> '/usr/lib/lxc/rootfs'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.125 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:setup_utsname:919 - 'mycnt' hostname has been setup
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:setup_netdev:2479 - 'eth0' has been setup
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:setup_network:2500 - network has been setup
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_autodev:1148 - Mounting /dev under /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_autodev:1169 - Mounted tmpfs onto /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs/dev
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_autodev:1187 - Mounted /dev under /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_entry:1735 - remounting /shared on /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs/tmp 
> >>>> to respect bind or remount optios
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_entry:1750 - (at remount) flags for /shared was 0, required 
> >>>> extra flags are 0
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_entry:1759 - mountflags already was 4098, skipping remount
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 DEBUG    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_entry:1785 - mounted '/shared' on 
> >>>> '/usr/lib/lxc/rootfs/tmp', type 'none'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:mount_file_entries:2034 - mount points have been setup
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:fill_autodev:1215 - Creating initial consoles under 
> >>>> /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs/dev
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.153 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:fill_autodev:1226 - Populating /dev under /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.154 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:fill_autodev:1258 - Populated /dev under /usr/lib/lxc/rootfs
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.154 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:setup_dev_console:1515 - console has been setup
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.154 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:do_tmp_proc_mount:3576 - I am 1, /proc/self points to ''
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.161 INFO     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:do_tmp_proc_mount:3602 - Mounted /proc in container for security 
> >>>> transition
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.500 ERROR    lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:prepare_ramfs_root:1378 - Invalid argument - Unable to umount 
> >>>> /proc
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.500 ERROR    lxc_conf - conf.c:lxc_setup:3917 
> >>>> - failed to set rootfs for 'mycnt'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.500 ERROR    lxc_start - start.c:do_start:699 
> >>>> - failed to setup the container
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.500 ERROR    lxc_sync - sync.c:__sync_wait:51 
> >>>> - invalid sequence number 1. expected 2
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.500 WARN     lxc_conf - 
> >>>> conf.c:lxc_delete_network:2996 - failed to remove interface 'eth0'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.515 ERROR    lxc_start - 
> >>>> start.c:__lxc_start:1164 - failed to spawn 'mycnt'
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.669 ERROR    lxc_start_ui - 
> >>>> lxc_start.c:main:344 - The container failed to start.
> >>>>       lxc-start         40.669 ERROR    lxc_start_ui - 
> >>>> lxc_start.c:main:348 - Additional information can be obtained by setting 
> >>>> the --logfile and --logprio.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/28/2015 05:09 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >>>>> Quoting Przemyslaw Rudy ([email protected]):
> >>>>>> Referring to this patch:
> >>>>>> https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/2014-October/010604.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Starting lxc with userns in prepare_ramfs_root() I got -1 from:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> rv or errno?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> if (umount2("./proc", MNT_DETACH)) {
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Shall this error be rather ignored in case of userns? Thus the same
> >>>>>> logic as for other mount points processed by mentioned function?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you give full (-l trace -o debug.output) startup log?
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> lxc-devel mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> lxc-devel mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lxc-devel mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lxc-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > lxc-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
_______________________________________________
lxc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to