On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:13:56PM +0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Christian Brauner (christianvanbrau...@gmail.com):
> > Fixes for the return value checks.
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 10:38:21AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > Now we can e.g. implement ephemeral containers in a consistent way.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christianvanbrau...@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > >  100.0% src/lxc/
> > > diff --git a/src/lxc/start.c b/src/lxc/start.c
> > > index ffb8d12..1179d2c 100644
> > > --- a/src/lxc/start.c
> > > +++ b/src/lxc/start.c
> > > @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ const struct ns_info ns_info[LXC_NS_MAX] = {
> > >   [LXC_NS_NET] = {"net", CLONE_NEWNET}
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +static int bdev_destroy_wrapper(void *data);
> > > +static int lxc_rmdir_onedev_wrapper(void *data);
> > > +static void lxc_destroy_container_on_signal(struct lxc_handler *handler,
> > > +                                     const char *name);
> > > +
> > >  static void print_top_failing_dir(const char *path)
> > >  {
> > >   size_t len = strlen(path);
> > > @@ -495,6 +500,13 @@ void lxc_fini(const char *name, struct lxc_handler 
> > > *handler)
> > >           close(handler->ttysock[0]);
> > >           close(handler->ttysock[1]);
> > >   }
> > > + if (handler->conf->ephemeral > 0) {
> > > +         /* Only destroy when rootfs is overlayfs or aufs for now. The
> > > +          * function however, works for other bdev types as well. */
> > > +         if ((strncmp(handler->conf->rootfs.path, "overlayfs:", 10) == 
> > > 0) ||
> > > +            (strncmp(handler->conf->rootfs.path, "aufs:", 5) == 0))
> > > +                 lxc_destroy_container_on_signal(handler, name);
> > > + }
> > >   cgroup_destroy(handler);
> > >   free(handler);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1291,3 +1303,61 @@ int lxc_start(const char *name, char *const 
> > > argv[], struct lxc_conf *conf,
> > >   conf->need_utmp_watch = 1;
> > >   return __lxc_start(name, conf, &start_ops, &start_arg, lxcpath, 
> > > backgrounded);
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +static void lxc_destroy_container_on_signal(struct lxc_handler *handler,
> > > +                                     const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > + char destroy[MAXPATHLEN];
> > > + bool bret = true;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > + if (handler->conf && handler->conf->rootfs.path && 
> > > handler->conf->rootfs.mount) {
> > > +         if (am_unpriv())
> > > +                 ret = userns_exec_1(handler->conf, 
> > > bdev_destroy_wrapper, handler->conf);
> > > +         else
> > > +                 bret = bdev_destroy(handler->conf);
> > > +         if (ret < 0 || !bret) {
> > > +                 ERROR("Error destroying rootfs for %s", name);
> > > +         } else {
> > > +                 INFO("Destroyed rootfs for %s", name);
> > > +         }
> > > + }
> > 
> > The check for the return value here is wrong but it is fixed in the PR on 
> > github.
> > 
> > > + ret = snprintf(destroy, MAXPATHLEN, "%s/%s", handler->lxcpath, name);
> > > + if (ret < 0 || ret >= MAXPATHLEN)
> > > +         ERROR("Error creating string");
> > > + if (am_unpriv())
> > > +         ret = userns_exec_1(handler->conf, lxc_rmdir_onedev_wrapper, 
> > > destroy);
> > > + else
> > > +         ret = lxc_rmdir_onedev(destroy, NULL);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > +         ERROR("Error destroying container directory for %s", name);
> > > + } else {
> > > +         INFO("Destroyed directory for %s", name);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int bdev_destroy_wrapper(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct lxc_conf *conf = data;
> > > +
> > > + if (setgid(0) < 0) {
> > > +         ERROR("Failed to setgid to 0");
> > > +         return -1;
> > > + }
> > > + if (setgroups(0, NULL) < 0)
> > > +         WARN("Failed to clear groups");
> > > + if (setuid(0) < 0) {
> > > +         ERROR("Failed to setuid to 0");
> > > +         return -1;
> > > + }
> > > + if (!bdev_destroy(conf))
> > > +         return -1;
> > > + else
> > > +         return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int lxc_rmdir_onedev_wrapper(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + char *arg = (char *) data;
> > > + return lxc_rmdir_onedev(arg, NULL);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > -- 
> > > 2.5.1
> > > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christianvanbrau...@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > >  100.0% src/lxc/
> > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > index 2103437..9f22fdc 100644
> > > --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > @@ -2213,21 +2213,6 @@ static int lxc_rmdir_onedev_wrapper(void *data)
> > >   return lxc_rmdir_onedev(arg, "snaps");
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int do_bdev_destroy(struct lxc_conf *conf)
> > > -{
> > > - struct bdev *r;
> > > - int ret = 0;
> > > -
> > > - r = bdev_init(conf, conf->rootfs.path, conf->rootfs.mount, NULL);
> > > - if (!r)
> > > -         return -1;
> > > -
> > > - if (r->ops->destroy(r) < 0)
> > > -         ret = -1;
> > > - bdev_put(r);
> > > - return ret;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static int bdev_destroy_wrapper(void *data)
> > >  {
> > >   struct lxc_conf *conf = data;
> > > @@ -2242,13 +2227,16 @@ static int bdev_destroy_wrapper(void *data)
> > >           ERROR("Failed to setuid to 0");
> > >           return -1;
> > >   }
> > > - return do_bdev_destroy(conf);
> > > + if (!bdev_destroy(conf))
> > > +         return -1;
> > > + else
> > > +         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static bool container_destroy(struct lxc_container *c)
> > >  {
> > >   bool bret = false;
> > > - int ret;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > >   struct lxc_conf *conf;
> > >  
> > >   if (!c || !do_lxcapi_is_defined(c))
> > > @@ -2304,8 +2292,8 @@ static bool container_destroy(struct lxc_container 
> > > *c)
> > >           if (am_unpriv())
> > >                   ret = userns_exec_1(conf, bdev_destroy_wrapper, conf);
> > >           else
> > > -                 ret = do_bdev_destroy(conf);
> > > -         if (ret < 0) {
> > > +                 bret = bdev_destroy(conf);
> > > +         if (ret < 0 || !bret) {
> > >                   ERROR("Error destroying rootfs for %s", c->name);
> > >                   goto out;
> > >           }
> > 
> > The check for the return value here is wrong but it is fixed in the PR on 
> > github.
> 
> Oh.  It's much better if you simply reply to the email with the actual
> patch, as that's how I follow the conversation :)
> 

Ok :)

> Once the rest of the conversation dies down, can you send a clean
> new rebased v2 patchset as a new thread?

Of course!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to