The following pull request was submitted through Github.
It can be accessed and reviewed at: https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/850

This e-mail was sent by the LXC bot, direct replies will not reach the author
unless they happen to be subscribed to this list.

=== Description (from pull-request) ===
If lxcfs starts before cgroup-lite, then the first cgroup mountpoints in
/proc/self/mountinfo are /run/lxcfs/*.  Unprivileged users cannot access
these.  So privileged containers are ok, and unprivileged containers are ok
since they won't cache those to begin with.  But unprivileged root-owned
containers cache /run/lxcfs/* and then try to use them.

So when doing cgroup automounting check whether the mountpoints we have
stored are accessible, and if not look for a new one to use.

Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
From d3f99e96fb70732bdb11d247f457cb0771665b1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:01:12 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] cgfs: make sure we use valid cgroup mountpoints

If lxcfs starts before cgroup-lite, then the first cgroup mountpoints in
/proc/self/mountinfo are /run/lxcfs/*.  Unprivileged users cannot access
these.  So privileged containers are ok, and unprivileged containers are ok
since they won't cache those to begin with.  But unprivileged root-owned
containers cache /run/lxcfs/* and then try to use them.

So when doing cgroup automounting check whether the mountpoints we have
stored are accessible, and if not look for a new one to use.

Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
---
 src/lxc/cgfs.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/lxc/cgfs.c b/src/lxc/cgfs.c
index 97a4e6d..e2d8934 100644
--- a/src/lxc/cgfs.c
+++ b/src/lxc/cgfs.c
@@ -636,6 +636,11 @@ static struct cgroup_hierarchy 
*lxc_cgroup_find_hierarchy(struct cgroup_meta_dat
        return NULL;
 }
 
+static bool mountpoint_is_accessible(struct cgroup_mount_point *mp)
+{
+       return mp && access(mp->mount_point, F_OK) == 0;
+}
+
 static struct cgroup_mount_point *lxc_cgroup_find_mount_point(struct 
cgroup_hierarchy *hierarchy, const char *group, bool should_be_writable)
 {
        struct cgroup_mount_point **mps;
@@ -643,9 +648,9 @@ static struct cgroup_mount_point 
*lxc_cgroup_find_mount_point(struct cgroup_hier
        ssize_t quality = -1;
 
        /* trivial case */
-       if (hierarchy->rw_absolute_mount_point)
+       if (mountpoint_is_accessible(hierarchy->rw_absolute_mount_point))
                return hierarchy->rw_absolute_mount_point;
-       if (!should_be_writable && hierarchy->ro_absolute_mount_point)
+       if (!should_be_writable && 
mountpoint_is_accessible(hierarchy->ro_absolute_mount_point))
                return hierarchy->ro_absolute_mount_point;
 
        for (mps = hierarchy->all_mount_points; mps && *mps; mps++) {
@@ -655,6 +660,9 @@ static struct cgroup_mount_point 
*lxc_cgroup_find_mount_point(struct cgroup_hier
                if (prefix_len == 1 && mp->mount_prefix[0] == '/')
                        prefix_len = 0;
 
+               if (!mountpoint_is_accessible(mp))
+                       continue;
+
                if (should_be_writable && mp->read_only)
                        continue;
 
@@ -1396,8 +1404,9 @@ static bool cgroupfs_mount_cgroup(void *hdata, const char 
*root, int type)
        for (info = base_info; info; info = info->next) {
                size_t subsystem_count, i;
                struct cgroup_mount_point *mp = info->designated_mount_point;
-               if (!mp)
+               if (!mountpoint_is_accessible(mp))
                        mp = lxc_cgroup_find_mount_point(info->hierarchy, 
info->cgroup_path, true);
+
                if (!mp) {
                        SYSERROR("could not find original mount point for 
cgroup hierarchy while trying to mount cgroup filesystem");
                        goto out_error;
_______________________________________________
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to