On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:54:27AM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote: > The warning has been present since commit 32b37181ea (with no purpose stated). > Support for dynamically linked Busybox has been added since commit bf6cc73696. > Haven't encountered any issues with dynamically linked Busybox in my last > 2 years' testing. > > Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stéphane Graber <[email protected]> > --- > templates/lxc-busybox.in | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/templates/lxc-busybox.in b/templates/lxc-busybox.in > index f547f9e..336fa12 100644 > --- a/templates/lxc-busybox.in > +++ b/templates/lxc-busybox.in > @@ -304,13 +304,6 @@ configure_busybox() > return 1 > fi > > - file -L $(which busybox) | grep -q "statically linked" > - if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then > - echo "warning : busybox is not statically linked." > - echo "warning : The template script may not correctly" > - echo "warning : setup the container environment." > - fi > - > # copy busybox in the rootfs > cp $(which busybox) $rootfs/bin > if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
