Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> writes: > I admittedly didn't test running lxc-start in the background, but it > blocks SIGTTOU, so it should be unaffected...
Thinking again, maybe we could turn the table and change the process group ID of lxc-start instead, thereby putting it into the background. No, that sounds badly contrived. Rather, put our child into the foreground only if we're in the foreground in the first place... Okay, I'm far too sleepy now to think clearly. Maybe tomorrow. -- Cheers, Feri. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
