Stefan Tomanek wrote: > Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr): > >> Are we sure, we want to add these hooks (pre and post) ? I am not >> against adding them, but IMO it is more sane to add them if needed >> rather than adding something which may not be used. > > Well, until now, there was not a single hook, although I desperately > needed one. And there are probably people out there who might use > these hooks and are not able to add them for themselves. > >> Wouldn't preferable to have these two hooks: >> >> lxc.network.script.up >> lxc.network.script.down >> >> (script parameter will need 'name', 'conf section' 'up' | 'down' ... > > I still advise to split the hooks into generic ones and those specific > to the network type. The parameters passed to a script configuring a veth > device will be completely different than those passed to a macvlan device; > generic commands can then be placed in a different script, while special > commands can be handled in specific scripts.
Note that the script may receive other parameters, depending on the type of the network device, just the first 3 are fixed. THere's also $ENVIRONMENT $VARIABLES for us. > I'd at least propose to use two hooks for setting up the interface, on being > called > in instanciate_* (.up?), passing the arguments suitable to that network type, > as well as > one generic (.post-up?) If there's a need, the "specific" script may call some common code/script by its own, or the reverse. There's no need to do that in lxc. Of if we do, how about adding a _set_ of scripts for each "stage" ? :) >> If there is a need for a pre or post hook, we can easily add later: > > Sure, _we_ probably can, but not the person who might need the patch. There > are quite > many sysadmins who are masters at shell scripting, but are unable to add such > a hook > to a C codebase. Not being able to extend the system in an easy fashion would > be a huge > show stopper for them, just as the lack of scripting was to me. There IS a trivial way to extend system already (when just ONE hook is implemented) - chain your scripts. There's no need to re-implement shell in lxc. /mjt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel