lxc init modifies a different signal mask in the loop than the one it's
installing with sigaction in the loop. It appears that either these
lines should move outside the loop, or the intent was to clear the
bits of the sa_mask instead of the mask.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matth...@us.ibm.com>
Should the same mask bits be cleared from the mask set with
sigprocmask prior to sigprocmask() above? (won't show up in diff
context, sorry)
---
src/lxc/lxc_init.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_init.c b/src/lxc/lxc_init.c
index a534b51..b111494 100644
--- a/src/lxc/lxc_init.c
+++ b/src/lxc/lxc_init.c
@@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
struct sigaction act;
sigfillset(&act.sa_mask);
- sigdelset(&mask, SIGILL);
- sigdelset(&mask, SIGSEGV);
- sigdelset(&mask, SIGBUS);
+ sigdelset(&act.sa_mask, SIGILL);
+ sigdelset(&act.sa_mask, SIGSEGV);
+ sigdelset(&act.sa_mask, SIGBUS);
act.sa_flags = 0;
act.sa_handler = interrupt_handler;
sigaction(i, &act, NULL);
--
1.7.4.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
