Quoting Stefan Schlesinger (s...@ono.at):
> 
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote:
> > Just FYI, current git now allows you to list running containers
> > only with the '--active' flag to lxc-ls.
> 
> The current version in Git also lists 'lost+found' as a virtual machine,
> in case /var/lib/lxc is a separate filesystem (same to lxc-list).
> 
> I'd really like to urge to revise these commands, before the lxc API will
> freeze.

Good point.  But note that lxc-ls is currently a script with no code in
liblxc, so while we may get a version of the API with no ls defined, at
least it won't have ls badly defined :)

> IMHO the functionality of the three status commands could even be merged into
> a single utility:
> 
> * lxc-ls
> * lxc-list
> * lxc-info

Jonathan, is your modified lxc-ls another script?  I liked the output of
your lxc-ls :)

Would someone care to write a patch to implement ls in the api, against
lp:~ubuntu-lxc/ubuntu/quantal/lxc/lxc-api-and-python/ (define it in
src/lxc/lxccontainer.{c,h}?  I may not be able to get to it until the
week after next.

-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to