On 11/27/2012 02:13 AM, Natanael Copa wrote: > There is no reason to depend on bash for a single echo. > > Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa <nc...@alpinelinux.org>
Applied to staging. Thanks. As for whether to move that code to lxc-info, I don't think that'd be the right thing to do as lxc-info is meant to retrieve information from a container, not from the host. However, I think it'd make sense to have the version exposed by the C API so that we may be able to implement a consistent "--version" to all LXC commands that'd return the lxc version number. If we do that, then there won't be any need for lxc-version anymore. > --- > Changes v1 -> v2: > - add signed-off-by > > src/lxc/lxc-version.in | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-version.in b/src/lxc/lxc-version.in > index 1bd055a..b6875da 100644 > --- a/src/lxc/lxc-version.in > +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-version.in > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ > -#!/bin/bash > +#!/bin/sh > > echo "lxc version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@" > -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
