Quoting Leon Waldman (le.wald...@gmail.com): > Sorry for repost it here, but looks like the lxc-user list doesn't have > the same rate of view :P > > Hi, > > > We are planning to deploy LXC in production using CentOS 6.3. > > The problem is that it ships with kernel 2.6.32-279 per default, and > AFAIK this is a not recommended version to use with LXC. > > Now, the issue is... The kernel Long Term version from EPEL is the 3.0 > version... the Main Line is currently on 3.7 but it's changing the major > version every 6 weeks. > > > It would worth the testing overhead of keeping changing the kernel major > version every 6 weeks to have a bigger then 3.0 running or the 3.0 > version is enough feature complete to use on a production environment?
With 3.0, I think you'll only miss user namespaces (not 100% complete anyway) and the very latest setns stuff which just hit 3.8. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
